雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核,综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力,实现“沟通为本的”考试理念。对于雅思考生来说,也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了文章雅思大作文范文及解析:公共交通投资,希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题,敬请关注。
雅思无忧网小编推荐:
Public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free for the people who use it.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.公共交通应该由*资助,这样使用它的人就可以*。你在多大程度上同意或不同意这个说法。
该题目属于*类议论文,一般考察*的责任和资金分配问题,比如*如何解决垃圾回收及环境问题,立法是否是唯一办法,*是否要投资艺术,体育馆,太空研究,教育等等。该题目关于*是否要资助公共交通,使得人们免费享用。如果所有公共交通包括公交车,地铁,高铁甚至飞机都是免费的话,民众肯定欢喜雀跃,估计离共产主义也不远了。但细细想来,这个做法会带来更多的问题,*不堪负重,公共交通内部必然拥堵不堪无法承载过多人口。相反,交给私营企业去运营,*负责监管才是更合理的做法,民众购*车票,服务也才更有保障。
P1:引入话题+亮明观点;
P2:让步段:*有责任为民众提供方便的出行/缓解交通拥堵和环境污染;
P3:指出为什么不同意观点一:*压力过大,影响其他方面开支如医疗教育/公众不珍惜和爱护公共设施;
P4:指出为什么不同意观点二:最好交给私人企业运营,他们更了解市场/设计运营路线/提升服务;
P5:总结全文:重申中心论点。
neither feasible nor desirable既不可行也不可取
convenient and economical 方便经济的
alleviates traffic congestion and environment deterioration缓解交通堵塞和环境恶化
pose a tremendous burden on 带来巨大的负担
progress and prosperity 进步和繁荣
the enterprise of civil society 公民社会的开拓进取
vandali* 故意破坏公物
more attractive and affordable 更有吸引力更实惠
the additional advantages 附加的优点
the flexibility of autonomous travel 自主出行的灵活性
Free availability of public transport clearly has a number of desirable advantages for people’s commuting as well as for the environment generally. Nevertheless, from my perspective, the practice that public transportation is totally invested by the government to achieve free of charge is neither feasible nor desirable.
Granted, it is the government’s responsibility to provide a convenient and economical traveling mode for citizens as the taxes paid by people should be allocated to improve the infrastructure. In addition, free tickets will definitely reduce reliance on private vehicles. There is considerable evidence suggesting that where public transport options are cheaper, people will use them more frequently, which in return alleviates traffic congestion and environment deterioration.
However, there are overwhelmingly more undesirable consequences. First of all, a tremendous burden is likely to be posed on local government since public traffic is not the only industry that needs money to keep running. A country’s progress and prosperity need to improve other priorities, be they health care or education, on which the enterprise of civil society hinges. Moreover, this might increase the potential for unimaginable chaos as public system will definitely become overcrowded. People generally do not treasure those obtained freely, so vandali* might occur and more money is needed to maintain and preserve these facilities, which is the last thing governments would want.
On the contrary, public traffic system could be managed more effectively and made more attractive and affordable by private enterprises. Being more sensitive to the market, they tend to employ relevant experts to carry out research before designing routines, running time, ticket prices and so on. With tickets being purchased, individuals will also enjoy high level of service, which has the additional advantages of encouraging them to keep carriages clean whilst allowing them the flexibility of autonomous travel.
In summary, although free tickets will alleviate environment problems in a short time, more problems might be given rise to. Therefore, private companies rather than local government should assume the main responsibility to provide a convenient travel mode for people.